Learner Reviews & Feedback for Programming Languages, Part A by University of Washington
About the Course
Top reviews
MK
Jun 16, 2017
Good fundaments for learning new programming languages. Well prepared and challenging homeworks. I learned a lot of functional programming concepts fom this course and I am sure I will use them.
SS
Jan 3, 2017
Instant favourite programming course. Great instructor and material, fun assignments, mind-bendy recursion, cool concepts you didn't know you wanted to know about. Learned a lot.
551 - 556 of 556 Reviews for Programming Languages, Part A
By Musa J
•Sep 18, 2024
no support from compiler nor editor & no IDE for debug; very dated approach to functional programming
By Hans H
•Dec 8, 2023
It is far too much work to learn the completely outdated editing tool Emacs. I lost interest.
By Kyle A
•Nov 20, 2023
The content is good, but I can't stand the peer-reviewed assignments.
By Gino H
•Jul 6, 2023
Emacs is the worst possible editor to deal with for someonw who wants to learn in this course.
This turns out to be and Emacs course, as you spend all your energy trying to deal with issues related to emacs instead of learning what you are here for: programming.
Emacs gets in the way of actually doing that learning. And there is no support. The forum is a joke.
The instructor cares more about emacs than actually teaching programming.
How does this course even gets rated highly?
By Чумин М Л
•Jun 6, 2024
Not a modern high-level programming language with difficult syntax